The readings for the day were Psalm 119:97-104 and John 1:9-18.
William Temple was not one
to put on airs. He wouldn’t have been one to choose a Gospel reading—just in case he was to be celebrated by
the church.
Instead,
I think our Gospel reading found him, the “good news” according to John, about
the light coming into the world, and piercing the darkness. To the benefit of
this preacher, Temple wrote a commentary on John’s Gospel--which I have
read. To the benefit of the world, Temple lived out that Gospel.
It chose him.
He
was born in a Bishop’s Palace in 1881:
his father was Bishop of Exeter, and became Archbishop of Canterbury himself
when William was 14. William was said to
have been a happy child, and a happy person, a “once-born Christian,” actively
engaged in his father’s work and in the world. Despite suffering from
debilitating attacks of gout from age two on, his energy was boundless. As headmaster,
rector, bishop of Manchester, Archbishop of York, and finally, Archbishop of
Canterbury, he worked tirelessly, but was known for an unruffled serenity and
good cheer.
He
had a great intellect: Still, he was more thinker than scholar; more lover of
theology than theologian. Above all, he could not separate faith and good works,
and they came together for him in his work for justice. For the light who came
into the world is love, and, “justice,” Temple wrote, “is the primary form of love in social organization.”
Star -- Trygve Skogran |
Christ is the true light of John’s
Gospel, but Temple saw God as always present in history, and there have always
been those who reflected God’s light in the world. He pointed to abolitionist William
Wilberforce, the 12 apostles, and the prophet Isaiah. They were not themselves
the source of light but those who turned to the light and reflected it to
others. As Temple did in his day.
There
was indeed darkness in his times. A stultifying class system. A trickle-down
system of charity rooted in patronage and rural parishes in a country that was
now urban and industrial. Despite some social reforms, there were still terrible
slums, oppressive factories, child labor, and grinding poverty. Temple came to maturity
in the gilded age, where the gap between rich and poor became even more
dramatic. There followed the slaughter and carnage of the Great War, a blight
on the nations who claimed to lead the civilized world--and a great leveler of
social classes. Then, the Great Depression, and the rise of fascism in Europe.
Dark days indeed.
When
Temple was in boarding school, a teacher encouraged students to spend their
summers in the London slums. This experience was one of several that revealed
his course to him, experiences that Temple couldn’t unsee. First, he couldn’t
unsee the poverty and misery, and the structural barriers that kept people from
rising out of it.
Second,
he couldn’t unsee that the ordinary people he encountered were made in the
image of God as surely as he was. Above and beyond their material needs, Temple
saw that poverty robbed them of the dignity of participating in and
contributing to their communities.
Finally,
he couldn’t unsee the distant, ineffectual role of the Church of England in
light of these concerns. The Church was inwardly focused, spouting a bland
public morality concerned largely with gambling, sex and drink. As Hitler came
to power, its position was a detached pacifism. The Church was a fortress, disinclined
to work with other Christian denominations, and across faiths. It was reflecting
very little light into the world.
Not your typical Archbishop! |
And
so, Temple acted. He made all of England his parish. He reached out to the
people--to young people, especially. Never lofty or distant, he took up approachable
topics such asm "What Christians Should
Do Now." He set forth principles for
Christian social action–affordable housing;
education for all children; a sustainable income for all; sufficient leisure; and
a voice for every worker in the workplace. He used his platform to influence
social discourse, as a convener, moderator, preacher, and teacher. He offered others
a seat at his table; he wrote articles in popular magazines, and spoke on BBC Radio.
An
attendee at an ecumenical convening Temple hosted at Canterbury wrote that the deepest
impression he left was not his considerable intellect, or keen understanding—but
his holiness. Reinhold Niebuhr said of him, “few of us have known any person
whose life and personality were so completely and successfully integrated
around love for Christ as their focus and crown.”
You
see, Temple was never broken by the brokenness of the world around him. He was
turned toward Christ. The spiritual insight of John’s Gospel, for him, was that
the redemption of humankind is but one part, albeit an important part—of a
great thing—the redemption by God of the whole universe. The whole being of humanity—material and
individual, social and historical—falls within this plan of redemption. “Till
that be accomplished,” he wrote, “the darkness abides, pierced but un-illumined
by the beam of divine light.”
When
he died in 1944, England mourned “the people’s archbishop.” He was a light to
England, and a light to the Church. He enlightens the Northwest neighborhood through
the house that bears his name. But if he were here, he would remind us to think
less on him, and turn toward Christ, the one true light. For while the darkness
abides, it is we who must be the beacons—we who reflect the light of Christ in
the world.
“The
great question for everyone,” Temple wrote, “is whether we will ‘walk in
darkness’ or ‘walk in light.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment